The current New Yorker unfolds an engaging story on childhood food allergies. As related by Dr. Jerome Groopman, therea??s a shift in how some doctors think about how these conditions ??are best managed and, even better — might be prevented. The article feeds into recent discussion that medical science, and even dogma, too-often turns out to be incorrect.
Groopman interviews Dr. Hugh Sampson, director of the Jae Food Allergy Institute at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York:
a?|a??This increase in the incidence of food allergy is real,a?? Sampson said when we spoke recently. He cannot say what is causing the increase, but he now thinks the conventional approach to preventing food allergies is misconceived. For most of his career, he believed, like most allergists, that children are far less likely to become allergic to problematic foods if they are not exposed to them as infants. But now Sampson and other specialists believe that early exposure may actually help prevent food allergies.a??
I recommend the full read if you can get it: Groopman probes potential causes of discordant food allergy rates in children of different geographic regions. I learned a number of details on how some doctors in the U.S. use protein-breakdown methods to desensitize children to food allergies, how in Israel newly-speaking infants are said to ask eagerly for Bamba, a manufactured, peanut-containing snack (which, for the record, I dona??t particularly endorse), and how in some cultures parents chew their young childrena??s food in a manner that might that might facilitate breakdown of complex proteins by enzymes in saliva.
All interesting. Of course ita??s hard to know exactly whata??s true in this, and the causes of allergies are likely to vary among children. Therea??s a randomized LEAP study (Learning Early About Peanut Allergy) in the U.K. that may provide some hard evidence on this, one way or another.
No comments:
Post a Comment